Arizona Court of Appeals upholds rights of Native American adoptive parents

The Goldwater Institute applauded a decision by the Arizona Court of Appeals that upheld the rights of adoptive parents in a case involving the controversial Indian Child Welfare Act.

That Act—which made headlines in a recent unrelated case involving a six-year-old California girl named Lexi—gives tribal governments broad powers to block adoption of Indian children by non-tribal members, according to a press release.

The Arizona decision involves a two-year-old girl known as “A.D.” who was taken from a drug-addicted mother shortly after birth and placed in the custody of a non-Indian foster family.  When the foster parents tried to adopt her, the Gila River Indian Community asked judges to transfer the case its own tribal court to block the adoption.

In their Aug. 11 decision, the judges held that the tribe acted too late.

“This decision comes as a great relief,” said Adi Dynar, in the release. Mr. Dynar is the Goldwater Institute attorney who argued the case.

“But it just highlights the problems with the Indian Child Welfare Act.  This law creates a separate and unequal legal system for children of Native American ancestry.”

Mr. Dynar is part of the team of Goldwater Institute lawyers challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in a federal civil rights case in Arizona federal court. A.D. is one of the children involved in that case, as well.

The Act, passed in 1978, applies to children who are “eligible” for membership in an Indian tribe, the release stated. It gives tribal governments powers equal to—and sometimes greater than—the rights of birth parents.

“Even if an Indian parent wants her child adopted, and doesn’t want the Act to apply, the tribe can override those wishes and block the adoption,” explained Mr. Dynar in the release.

Federal law forbids racial discrimination in all adoption cases—but contains one exception: Indian children.

“They’re the only people it’s legal to discriminate against on the basis of race,” said Mr. Dynar in the release. “But it’s important to remember: all Indian children are citizens of the United States, entitled to constitutional protections.”

The Aug. 11 court decision noted that the tribe had many opportunities over the previous two years to find A.D. an adoptive home with tribal members, but none proved workable. Only after the birth mother’s parental rights had been terminated by court order did the tribe try to take over the case.

“By not moving to transfer jurisdiction before termination of the biological parents’ rights,” the court held, “the [tribe] effectively waived its right” to do so, the release stated.

Because the Act tries to block adoptions of Indian children by non-Indians, Native American children are often stuck in foster care much longer than children of other races, noted Mr. Dynar in the release.

Because the Act doesn’t focus on the child’s best interests, courts often don’t consider a child’s psychological need for stable and permanent homes.  That means Indian children are often moved from one home to another through the course of their lives, according to the press release.

“We’re very grateful that the court has laid this case to rest and ensured that A.D. will have a bright future with a loving adoptive family,” Mr. Dynar said in the release.

Learn more about the Goldwater Institute’s work to ensure equal protection for all children at http://equalprotection.org.

The Scottsdale Independent is published monthly and mailed to 75,000 homes and businesses in Scottsdale.

You are encouraged to leave relevant comments but engaging in personal attacks, threats, online bullying or commercial spam will not be allowed. All comments should remain within the bounds of fair play and civility. (You can disagree with others courteously, without being disagreeable.) Feel free to express yourself but keep an open mind toward finding value in what others say. To report abuse or spam, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box.